Dallas, TX, March 29  — Several PL’ers attended a small conference here of members of the One Democratic State (in Palestine) group.
This group oppose the two-state proposal because of two basic reasons: 1) Given the use of the right-wing settlements by the Israeli government to divide up and take over more and more of the remaining West Bank, any “Palestinian state” will be a collection of geographically separated islands. 2) All residents of, and refugees from, Palestine of all ethnicities should be able to live together in peace, justice and equality. They also want to see the end of both the Zionist government and the Palestinian Authority, which they view as a puppet of the government of Israel.
At the conference the question of what kind of state should be implemented was raised by PL’ers. Whether there are two states or one state, as long as it is under capitalism there will continue to be inequality, racism, oppression, exploitation and wars. Only by building communist revolution will we ever have a world where working-class families can live together as one.
There was no agreement on what type of state there should be. It was left with the statement,  “We encourage continued discussion on the future economic system.”
At the conference we did meet some  people who are looking for ways to work for a better world. CHALLENGEs and flyers were distributed to people with whom we talked.  We plan to keep in touch with some of those we met. It is important that we not ignore opportunities to reach out to people with our politics and our actions. The working class has nothing to lose but our chains.

“Peace is an extension of war by other means,” said U.S. strategist Anthony Cordesman, referring to Barack Obama’s shaky nuclear deal with Iran (Center for Strategic and International Studies website, 3/30/15). The agreement, which calls for Iran to scale back its nuclear program in exchange for a relaxation of sanctions, is  a move toward war. While the deal may represent a temporary thaw in hostilities, the fact remains that U.S. bosses remain locked in an increasingly deadly struggle with China and Russia — the main backers of the Iranian regime — for control over the Middle East’s vast energy wealth.
At the same time, U.S. capitalists are fighting among themselves over how best to curb Iran’s influence in the Middle East. What they fear most is the encirclement and isolation of Saudi Arabia — the grand prize of U.S. imperialism for its oil fields — by Iran and its regional allies.
As the inter-imperialist conflict intensifies and the U.S. inevitably wages a broader war in the Middle East to protect its vital interests, workers will be the cannon fodder. The international working class has no stake in this capitalist competition. Our only solution is a communist revolution led by the Progressive Labor Party.
Buying Time
For the dominant wing of U.S. capitalism, Obama’s Iran deal is a ploy to buy time until the bosses are ready for all-out invasion. When John Bolton, former UN ambassador under George W. Bush, wrote a New York Times Op-Ed column titled, “To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran” (March 26), he was attacked for “criminal stupidity” by Harlan Ullman, a senior adviser at the Atlantic Council, a finance capital think tank. Ullman is no pacifist. He co-authored the Pentagon’s “Shock and Awe” doctrine that guided the U.S. invasion of Iraq — and slaughtered thousands of civilians — in 2003. This doctrine stipulates the use of overwhelming force to undermine the enemy’s will to fight.
Shock and Awe ultimately failed in Iraq because it did not anticipate the scale of anti-U.S. backlash, now exploited by the Islamic State (ISIS). But the U.S. bosses will do their best to apply the lesson of Iraq to Iran. As Ullman noted,

“We will have to take out a good portion of their air defenses and other conventional forces, and that is going to get a retaliatory series of strikes by Iran... We need to know what that’s likely to be, and how we’re able to deal with it, before we make a decision to go to war” (Newsmax, 3/27/15).

U.S. Capitalists Prepare for Onslaught
U.S. rulers are nowhere near prepared — politically or militarily — to take on Iran. But they are working on it. The Council on Foreign Relations, the leading think tank for U.S. imperialism, outlined a strategy that the hair-trigger Bolton would admire. Should Tehran drag its heels in shutting down its nuclear program on Obama’s terms, the Council laid out a scenario for action:

In week one, the Security Council or the alliance of the willing would demand that Iran verifiably reverse itself within no more than two weeks. Failure to comply would result in week three’s suspension of all international commerce to isolate Iran’s economy....Week five would bring the cessation of all commercial air and maritime travel to Iran to further isolate…Week seven, the partners would implement a Cuban missile crisis…Then, in week nine, the United States would lead air strikes to destroy all suspected nuclear sites…until Tehran opened its territory to international inspectors authorized to eliminate all nuclear contraband.

In preparation, Obama is beefing up anti-Iran firepower. As the Wall Street Journal reported, “the Pentagon has upgraded and tested the largest bunker-buster bomb in the U.S. arsenal…that could destroy or disable Iran’s most heavily fortified nuclear facilities should a nuclear deal fall apart” (4/3/15). But doubts persist about the megabomb’s effectiveness in destroying sites buried under mountains. Air Force generals concede that a successful hit would require the long-shot maneuver of “guiding two or more of the bunker busters to the same impact point, in sequence” (Wall Street Journal). In response, Obama is preparing for another plan. He has initiated a trillion-dollar modernization of the U.S. nuclear arms arsenal.
The dispute over when to bomb Iran — now or later — is already shaping the 2016 presidential race. Ted Cruz, the GOP’s first announced candidate, has enlisted Bolton as an adviser. Jeb Bush, whose father and brother both led genocidal Middle East oil wars, has fallen afoul of pro-Israeli Sheldon Adelson, the arch-Zionist U.S. billionaire who wants to blast Iran tomorrow. Bush is following the counsel of James Baker, the ExxonMobil and JPMorgan Chase heir who applauds Obama’s more measured approach and favors an eventual massive land war over air strikes. In 1991, as George H.W. Bush’s secretary of state, Baker helped lead the 750,000-troop effort to “liberate” Kuwait for British Petroleum and Exxon. In 2007, advising George W. Bush, his Baker Institute engineered the bloody Iraq “surge” that Obama called a success “beyond our wildest dreams.” As for Democratic hopeful Hillary Clinton, she voiced skepticism about Obama’s latest maneuver by noting that “the onus is on Iran” (Washington Post, 4/5/15).
Workers of the World, Unite!
Regardless of which wing of the ruling class prevails in defining U.S. policy in Iran, the working class will pay the price in the bosses’ fight for war-driven profits. Sooner or later, U.S. bosses will need ground troops to consolidate their oil interests in the Middle East. Using racism and nationalism, they’ll do their best to win millions of working-class youth and workers to fight and support that war.
The revolutionary communist Progressive Labor Party has a different plan. We are organizing workers in the U.S. and worldwide to turn imperialist war into a war for communist revolution — and to smash the capitalist system for all time.  On May 1 and May 2, PLP in the U.S. and around the world will commemorate May Day, marching for a society that will abolish imperialism, racism, sexism, poverty, and unemployment. We celebrate the power of the working class to one day run society in our collective class interests.Join us!

Brooklyn, APRIL 1 — Working-class anger raged this week at our school as students, parents and teachers united against an attack on a student by both school “safety” cops and New York City cops.
The incident began last Thursday on March 26, as students were on the line to pass through metal detectors to get to class. One student was wearing a pair of glasses fastened with a straight pin to replace a missing screw, as he’d done for several weeks. The school cops told him the pin was a weapon and made him remove his glasses so they could confiscate it.
When the student reached for his glasses, three agents tackled and handcuffed him. After one agent claimed she’d been elbowed in the face, the student was issued a summons for assault.  When school security released him, he went to the principal’s office to write a statement about what had happened. As he was writing, several cops — not the school cops who are under the command of the New York Police Department (NYPD) — entered the office. They stated they were arresting him for assault, pushed past the principal, slammed the student’s head into the table and handcuffed him again.
‘Students, Not Prisoners’
While this attack is particularly disturbing, it reflects a pattern of racist police terror that we have been struggling against for a long time. Last fall, we held a town hall meeting to demand an end to police harassment of our students as they leave school every afternoon. We also protested after the non-indictments of the police murderers of Mike Brown and Eric Garner.
After this latest incident of police terror, our student government and Parent Teacher Association sprang into action once again. Student government members, who were helping at parent-teacher conferences that night, quickly produced a button that read, “We are students, not prisoners.”
‘We Will Not Be Intimidated!’
By the next afternoon, we organized a protest during Friday’s early dismissal. An integrated group of parents, teachers and students picketed in front of school, demanding justice for the attacked student and the removal of scanners from our building. Over the weekend, parents met to organize observation of scanning for the following week. That Tuesday (3/31) we rallied outside the building’s student entrance, where scanning takes place. Students linked the cop terror at their schools to murder of Black, Latin youth throughout the country. One student boldly stated in response to the increased presence of NYPD that morning, “we will not be intimidated!”
Officials Seek to Pacify
Throughout the week, suited officials from school cops and the NYPD were in and out of our school, trying to “solve” things by pacifying the protesters rather than improving the treatment of students or removing the metal detectors. At lunchtime Tuesday, in the wake of our second protest, four officials met with students to listen to their concerns about security.
Their “listening” consisted of trying to convince students that they need scanning to protect them. But most students see through this racist rhetoric. They know that only a small percentage of New York City schools have scanning, and virtually all of them are predominantly Black and Latin.
Neither the Department of Education nor the NYPD have any interest in removing metal detectors from our school, a mainly Black and Latin school in a mainly white, well-to-do neighborhood. They have a vested interest in keeping our students intimidated and forcing them to leave the area immediately after school.
As we left school for spring break Thursday (4/2) afternoon, we learned of the officials’ intended solution for our school. The school’s head cop and the three agents involved in the attack are being transferred to other schools, but not disciplined or reprimanded in any way.
Some may see this as a victory; we made enough noise for the racist NYPD bosses to want to placate us. But the school cops in question will be free to attack students at their next school, and the ones who replace them here will have the same training and agenda. These cops are used to intimidate and criminalize students. That will change only when we destroy capitalism and the cops with communist revolution.
The real victories are the lessons we have learned and the relationships we have built. Over the years, our school has struggled against police terror, budget cuts, and the co-location of an “elite,” exclusive school in our building. Out of these struggles we have grown, and our fighting forces are stronger and more integrated than ever. This week we stood up to the system with a group of parents, teachers and students. We are men and women, young and old, Black, Latin, Asian and white. Now it is our job to turn this group for school reforms into dedicated fighters for communism!